The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.
https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-24-319-08
https://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities-threats/microsoft-late-dangerous-dnssec-zero-day-flaw
https://www.tenable.com/blog/microsofts-june-2024-patch-tuesday-addresses-49-cves
https://www.isc.org/blogs/2024-bind-security-release/
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240307-0008/
https://nlnetlabs.nl/news/2024/Feb/13/unbound-1.19.1-released/
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2024q1/017430.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00011.html
https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/02/msg00006.html
https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2023-50868
https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/-/releases/v5.7.1
https://docs.powerdns.com/recursor/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-2024-01.html
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5155
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219826
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-50868