Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used. This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue.

oracle CPUJul2024: MySQL Cluster 8.3.1

oracle CPUJul2024: MySQL Cluster 8.1.1

The versions of HTTP Server installed on the remote host are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the July 2024 CPU advisory:

  - Vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: SSL Module (zlib)). The     supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker     with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle HTTP Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result     in takeover of Oracle HTTP Server. (CVE-2023-45853)

  - Vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: SSL Module (LibExpat)). The     supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker     with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle HTTP Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result     in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle HTTP Server.
    (CVE-2023-52425)

  - Vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: SSL Module (libxml2)). The     supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker     with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle HTTP Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result     in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Oracle HTTP Server.
    (CVE-2024-25062)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of cloud-hypervisor-cvm / nodejs18 / openssl / nodejs installed on the remote CBL Mariner 2.0 host is prior to tested version. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the CVE-2023-6129 advisory.

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Oracle Linux 9 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the ELSA-2024-2447 advisory.

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the     '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-6237)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key     or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been     obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs     various checks on DH parameters. After fixing CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter     value can also trigger an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value, if     present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is unnecessary to perform these checks if     q is larger than p. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an     untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself     called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may     similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check().
    Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the -check     option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS     providers are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-3817)

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a     potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from     untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and     may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL     does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in     OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs     then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are:
    PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and     PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function     is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and     3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

  - Issue summary: The AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated     data entries which are unauthenticated as a consequence. Impact summary: Applications that use the AES-SIV     algorithm and want to authenticate empty data entries as associated data can be mislead by removing adding     or reordering such empty entries as these are ignored by the OpenSSL implementation. We are currently     unaware of any such applications. The AES-SIV algorithm allows for authentication of multiple associated     data entries along with the encryption. To authenticate empty data the application has to call     EVP_EncryptUpdate() (or EVP_CipherUpdate()) with NULL pointer as the output buffer and 0 as the input     buffer length. The AES-SIV implementation in OpenSSL just returns success for such a call instead of     performing the associated data authentication operation. The empty data thus will not be authenticated. As     this issue does not affect non-empty associated data authentication and we expect it to be rare for an     application to use empty associated data entries this is qualified as Low severity issue. (CVE-2023-2975)

  - Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or     parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to     generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(),     DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may     experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an     untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks     (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable     for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an     excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls     DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source     could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also     called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may     similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(),     EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line     application when using the -pubcheck option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
    The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers     are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-5678)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key     or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been     obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs     various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too     large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is     over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or     parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has     already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters     obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those     other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and     EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications     when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The     OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-3446)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Redhat Enterprise Linux 9 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the RHSA-2024:2447 advisory.

    OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS)     protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.

    Security Fix(es):

    * openssl: AES-SIV cipher implementation contains a bug that causes it to ignore empty associated data     entries (CVE-2023-2975)

    * openssl: Excessive time spent checking DH keys and parameters (CVE-2023-3446)

    * OpenSSL: Excessive time spent checking DH q parameter value (CVE-2023-3817)

    * openssl: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or     parameters may be very slow (CVE-2023-5678)

    * openssl: POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupts vector registers on PowerPC (CVE-2023-6129)

    * openssl: Excessive time spent checking invalid RSA public keys (CVE-2023-6237)

    * openssl: denial of service via null dereference (CVE-2024-0727)

    For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and     other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

    Additional Changes:

    For detailed information on changes in this release, see the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Release Notes     linked from the References section.

Tenable has extracted the preceding description block directly from the Red Hat Enterprise Linux security advisory.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The versions of MySQL Connectors installed on the remote host prior to 8.4.0, are affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the April 2024 CPU advisory.

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Connectors product of Oracle MySQL (component: Connector/C++ (OpenSSL)).     Supported versions that are affected are 8.3.0 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows     unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Connectors.     Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or     frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Connectors as well as unauthorized update, insert     or delete access to some of MySQL Connectors accessible data. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Connectors product of Oracle MySQL (component: Connector/ODBC (OpenSSL)).     Supported versions that are affected are 8.3.0 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows     unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Connectors.     Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently     repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Connectors as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete     access to some of MySQL Connectors accessible data. (CVE-2023-6129)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The versions of MySQL Server installed on the remote host are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the July 2024 CPU advisory.

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Packaging (OpenSSL)).
    Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.36 and prior and 8.3.0 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability     allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via TLS to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this     vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete     DOS) of MySQL Server as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of MySQL Server accessible     data. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: DML). Supported versions that     are affected are 8.0.34 and prior and 8.3.0 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged     attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this     vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS)     of MySQL Server as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of MySQL Server accessible     data. (CVE-2024-21015)

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Optimizer). Supported versions     that are affected are 8.0.36 and prior and 8.3.0 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high     privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of     this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete     DOS) of MySQL Server. (CVE-2024-20998)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The versions of MySQL Server installed on the remote host are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the July 2024 CPU advisory.

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Packaging (OpenSSL)).
    Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.36 and prior and 8.3.0 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability     allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via TLS to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this     vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete     DOS) of MySQL Server as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of MySQL Server accessible     data. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: DML). Supported versions that     are affected are 8.0.34 and prior and 8.3.0 and prior. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged     attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks of this     vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS)     of MySQL Server as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of MySQL Server accessible     data. (CVE-2024-21015)

  - Vulnerability in the MySQL Server product of Oracle MySQL (component: Server: Information Schema). Supported     versions that are affected are 8.0.36 and prior and 8.3.0 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability     allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Server. Successful     attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash     (complete DOS) of MySQL Server. (CVE-2024-20994)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The versions of MySQL Enterprise Monitor installed on the remote host are affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the April 2024 CPU advisory. Vulnerability in the MySQL Enterprise Monitor product of Oracle MySQL (component: Monitoring: General (OpenSSL)). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.37 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Enterprise Monitor. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Enterprise Monitor as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of MySQL Enterprise Monitor accessible data.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote SUSE Linux SLED15 / SLES15 / SLES_SAP15 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the SUSE-SU-2024:0518-1 advisory.

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the     '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. Found by OSS-Fuzz. Fix     developed by Tomas Mraz. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.13 (Affected since 3.0.0). (CVE-2023-6237)

  - Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a     potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from     untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and     may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL     does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in     OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs     then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are:
    PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and     PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function     is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and     3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 23.10 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the USN-6622-1 advisory.

  - Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or     parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to     generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(),     DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may     experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an     untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks     (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable     for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an     excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls     DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source     could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also     called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may     similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(),     EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line     application when using the -pubcheck option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
    The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers     are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-5678)

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a     potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from     untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and     may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL     does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in     OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs     then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are:
    PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and     PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function     is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and     3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the     '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. Found by OSS-Fuzz. Fix     developed by Tomas Mraz. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.13 (Affected since 3.0.0). (CVE-2023-6237)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote SUSE Linux SLED15 / SLED_SAP15 / SLES15 / SLES_SAP15 / openSUSE 15 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the SUSE-SU-2024:0172-1 advisory.

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the
    -pubin' and -check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. Found by OSS-Fuzz. Fix     developed by Tomas Mraz. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.2.1 (Affected since 3.2.0). (CVE-2023-6237)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of FreeBSD installed on the remote host is prior to tested version. It is, therefore, affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the 8337251b-b07b-11ee-b0d7-84a93843eb75 advisory.

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

Note that Nessus has not tested for this issue but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of OpenSSL installed on the remote host is prior to 3.2.1. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 3.2.1 advisory.

  - Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a     potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from     untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and     may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL     does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in     OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs     then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are:
    PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and     PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function     is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and     3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the     '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-6237)

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of OpenSSL installed on the remote host is prior to 3.1.5. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 3.1.5 advisory.

  - Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a     potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from     untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and     may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL     does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in     OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs     then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are:
    PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and     PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function     is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and     3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the     '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-6237)

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or     parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to     generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(),     DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may     experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an     untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks     (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable     for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an     excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls     DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source     could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also     called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may     similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(),     EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line     application when using the -pubcheck option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
    The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers     are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-5678)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of OpenSSL installed on the remote host is prior to 3.0.13. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 3.0.13 advisory.

  - Issue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL to crash leading to a     potential Denial of Service attack Impact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from     untrusted sources might terminate abruptly. A file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and     may come from an untrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but OpenSSL     does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer dereference that results in     OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12 files from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs     then that application will be vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are:
    PKCS12_parse(), PKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes() and     PKCS12_newpass(). We have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this function     is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant. The FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and     3.0 are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2024-0727)

  - Issue summary: Checking excessively long invalid RSA public keys may take a long time. Impact summary:
    Applications that use the function EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check RSA public keys may experience long     delays. Where the key that is being checked has been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a     Denial of Service. When function EVP_PKEY_public_check() is called on RSA public keys, a computation is     done to confirm that the RSA modulus, n, is composite. For valid RSA keys, n is a product of two or more     large primes and this computation completes quickly. However, if n is an overly large prime, then this     computation would take a long time. An application that calls EVP_PKEY_public_check() and supplies an RSA     key obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function     EVP_PKEY_public_check() is not called from other OpenSSL functions however it is called from the OpenSSL     pkey command line application. For that reason that application is also vulnerable if used with the     '-pubin' and '-check' options on untrusted data. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by     this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-6237)

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: Generating excessively long X9.42 DH keys or checking excessively long X9.42 DH keys or     parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_generate_key() to     generate an X9.42 DH key may experience long delays. Likewise, applications that use DH_check_pub_key(),     DH_check_pub_key_ex() or EVP_PKEY_public_check() to check an X9.42 DH key or X9.42 DH parameters may     experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an     untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. While DH_check() performs all the necessary checks     (as of CVE-2023-3817), DH_check_pub_key() doesn't make any of these checks, and is therefore vulnerable     for excessively large P and Q parameters. Likewise, while DH_generate_key() performs a check for an     excessively large P, it doesn't check for an excessively large Q. An application that calls     DH_generate_key() or DH_check_pub_key() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source     could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. DH_generate_key() and DH_check_pub_key() are also     called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may     similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_pub_key_ex(),     EVP_PKEY_public_check(), and EVP_PKEY_generate(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL pkey command line     application when using the -pubcheck option, as well as the OpenSSL genpkey command line application.
    The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers     are not affected by this issue. (CVE-2023-5678)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of OpenSSL installed on the remote host is prior to 3.0.12. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the 3.0.12 advisory.

  - Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might     corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides     vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is     used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The     POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the     contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these     vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer     PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal     application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not     depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker     could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector     registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some     application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm     is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated     data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If     this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used.
    This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are     currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider     this a Low severity security issue. (CVE-2023-6129)

  - Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths.
    This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
    Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of     confidentiality for some cipher modes. When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or     EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been     established. Any alterations to the key length, via the keylen parameter or the IV length, via the     ivlen parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing     truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4,     RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB. For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of     confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a     deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse. Both     truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in     some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security     critical. Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable     API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this     problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly     vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be     quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these     reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is     not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the     issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary. OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
    (CVE-2023-5363)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

ID	Name	Product	Family	Severity
202723	Oracle HTTP Server (July 2024 CPU)	Nessus	Web Servers	critical
201667	CBL Mariner 2.0 Security Update: cloud-hypervisor-cvm / nodejs18 / openssl / nodejs (CVE-2023-6129)	Nessus	MarinerOS Local Security Checks	medium
195055	Oracle Linux 9 : openssl / and / openssl-fips-provider (ELSA-2024-2447)	Nessus	Oracle Linux Local Security Checks	medium
194809	RHEL 9 : openssl and openssl-fips-provider (RHSA-2024:2447)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	medium
193581	Oracle MySQL Connectors C++ and ODBC (Apr 2024 CPU)	Nessus	Misc.	medium
193568	Oracle MySQL Server 8.0.x < 8.0.37 (July 2024 CPU)	Nessus	Databases	medium
193567	Oracle MySQL Server 8.x < 8.4.0 (July 2024 CPU)	Nessus	Databases	medium
193478	Oracle MySQL Enterprise Monitor (Apr 2024 CPU)	Nessus	CGI abuses	medium
190658	SUSE SLED15 / SLES15 Security Update : openssl-3 (SUSE-SU-2024:0518-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	medium
189992	Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / 22.04 LTS / 23.10 : OpenSSL vulnerabilities (USN-6622-1)	Nessus	Ubuntu Local Security Checks	medium
189308	SUSE SLED15 / SLES15 / openSUSE 15 Security Update : openssl-3 (SUSE-SU-2024:0172-1)	Nessus	SuSE Local Security Checks	medium
187961	FreeBSD : OpenSSL -- Vector register corruption on PowerPC (8337251b-b07b-11ee-b0d7-84a93843eb75)	Nessus	FreeBSD Local Security Checks	medium
187783	OpenSSL 3.2.0 < 3.2.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities	Nessus	Web Servers	medium
185161	OpenSSL 3.1.0 < 3.1.5 Multiple Vulnerabilities	Nessus	Web Servers	medium
185160	OpenSSL 3.0.0 < 3.0.13 Multiple Vulnerabilities	Nessus	Web Servers	medium
183891	OpenSSL 3.0.0 < 3.0.12 Multiple Vulnerabilities	Nessus	Web Servers	high

Detections

Analytics

CVE-2023-6129

medium

Tenable Plugins

Coming Soon

critical

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

medium

high