Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040434. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities

  - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any     valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-     prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. (CVE-2024-3596)

  - A remote code execution vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this to bypass authentication and execute     unauthorized arbitrary commands. (CVE-2024-30013, CVE-2024-38104)     Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040437. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities

  - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any     valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-     prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. (CVE-2024-3596)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040438. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities

  - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any     valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-     prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. (CVE-2024-3596)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The remote Windows host is missing security update 5040430. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities

  - RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any     valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-     prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. (CVE-2024-3596)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

ID	Name	Product	Family	Severity
202043	KB5040434: Windows 10 Version 1607 / Windows Server 2016 Security Update (July 2024)	Nessus	Windows : Microsoft Bulletins	critical
202039	KB5040437: Windows Server 2022 / Azure Stack HCI 22H2 Security Update (July 2024)	Nessus	Windows : Microsoft Bulletins	critical
202038	KB5040438: Windows 11 version 22H2 / Windows Server version 23H2 Security Update (July 2024)	Nessus	Windows : Microsoft Bulletins	critical
202028	KB5040430: Windows 10 version 1809 / Windows Server 2019 Security Update (July 2024)	Nessus	Windows : Microsoft Bulletins	critical

Detections

Analytics

CVE-2024-38076

critical

Tenable Plugins

critical

critical

critical

critical