| CVE-2025-1297 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2025-1234 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2025-0654 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2025-0305 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-9012 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-8895 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-7403 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-6616 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-6475 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-6474 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-5900 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-5054 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-5007 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-4938 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-3960 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-3953 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-3510 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-2219 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-12804 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-12762 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-12758 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-12685 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-12681 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-12154 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-11505 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-11389 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-11105 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-10243 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-10212 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2024-0398 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2023-6820 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2023-6818 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2023-6770 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2023-6726 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2023-5361 | Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | No Score |
| CVE-2025-7074 | A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in vercel hyper up to 3.4.1. This affects the function expand/braceExpand/ignoreMap of the file hyper/bin/rimraf-standalone.js. The manipulation leads to inefficient regular expression complexity. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | medium |
| CVE-2023-50786 | Dradis through 4.16.0 allows referencing external images (resources) over HTTPS, instead of forcing the use of embedded (uploaded) images. This can be leveraged by an authorized author to attempt to steal the Net-NTLM hashes of other authors on a Windows domain network. | medium |
| CVE-2025-47228 | In the Production Environment extension in Netmake ScriptCase through 9.12.006 (23), shell injection in the SSH connection settings allows authenticated attackers to execute system commands via crafted HTTP requests. | medium |
| CVE-2025-47227 | In the Production Environment extension in Netmake ScriptCase through 9.12.006 (23), the Administrator password reset mechanism is mishandled. Making both a GET and a POST request to login.php.is sufficient. An unauthenticated attacker can then bypass authentication via administrator account takeover. | high |
| CVE-2024-58254 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2024-11738. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2024-11738. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-11738 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | No Score |
| CVE-2025-53605 | The protobuf crate before 3.7.2 for Rust allows uncontrolled recursion in the protobuf::coded_input_stream::CodedInputStream::skip_group parsing of unknown fields in untrusted input. | medium |
| CVE-2025-53604 | The web-push crate before 0.10.3 for Rust allows a denial of service (memory consumption) in the built-in clients via a large integer in a Content-Length header. | medium |
| CVE-2025-53603 | In Alinto SOPE SOGo 2.0.2 through 5.12.2, sope-core/NGExtensions/NGHashMap.m allows a NULL pointer dereference and SOGo crash via a request in which a parameter in the query string is a duplicate of a parameter in the POST body. | high |
| CVE-2025-43711 | Tunnelblick 3.5beta06 before 7.0, when incompletely uninstalled, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code as root (upon the next boot) by dragging a crafted Tunnelblick.app file into /Applications. | high |
| CVE-2025-26850 | The agent in Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) before 14.0.97 and 14.1.x before 14.1.19 potentially allows privilege escalation on managed systems. | critical |
| CVE-2025-48952 | NetAlertX is a network, presence scanner, and alert framework. Prior to version 25.6.7, a vulnerability in the authentication logic allows users to bypass password verification using SHA-256 magic hashes, due to loose comparison in PHP. In vulnerable versions of the application, a password comparison is performed using the `==` operator at line 40 in front/index.php. This introduces a security issue where specially crafted "magic hash" values that evaluate to true in a loose comparison can bypass authentication. Because of the use of `==` instead of the strict `===`, different strings that begin with 0e and are followed by only digits can be interpreted as scientific notation (i.e., zero) and treated as equal. This issue falls under the Login Bypass vulnerability class. Users with certain "weird" passwords that produce magic hashes are particularly affected. Services relying on this logic are at risk of unauthorized access. Version 25.6.7 fixes the vulnerability. | critical |
| CVE-2025-7070 | A vulnerability has been found in IROAD Dashcam Q9 up to 20250624 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component MFA Pairing Request Handler. The manipulation leads to allocation of resources. The attack needs to be done within the local network. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | medium |
| CVE-2025-53366 | The MCP Python SDK, called `mcp` on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prior to version 1.9.4, a validation error in the MCP SDK can cause an unhandled exception when processing malformed requests, resulting in service unavailability (500 errors) until manually restarted. Impact may vary depending on the deployment conditions, and presence of infrastructure-level resilience measures. Version 1.9.4 contains a patch for the issue. | high |
| CVE-2025-53365 | The MCP Python SDK, called `mcp` on PyPI, is a Python implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Prior to version 1.10.0, if a client deliberately triggers an exception after establishing a streamable HTTP session, this can lead to an uncaught ClosedResourceError on the server side, causing the server to crash and requiring a restart to restore service. Impact may vary depending on the deployment conditions, and presence of infrastructure-level resilience measures. Version 1.10.0 contains a patch for the issue. | high |
| CVE-2025-7069 | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in HDF5 1.14.6. Affected is the function H5FS__sect_link_size of the file src/H5FSsection.c. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | medium |
