The version of HPE Network Node Manager i (NNMi) installed on the remote Linux host is 10.0x prior to 10.00 Patch 5, 10.1x prior to 10.10 Patch 4, or 10.2x prior to 10.20 Patch 3. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities that allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code, bypass security restrictions, and perform unauthorized actions.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

The version of HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT installed on the remote host is prior to 7.3 E0504P04. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :

  - A NULL pointer deference flaw exists, specifically in     the asn1_item_embed_d2i() function within file     crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c, when handling the ASN.1 CHOICE     type, which results in a NULL value being passed to the     structure callback if an attempt is made to free certain     invalid encodings. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this to cause a denial of service condition.
    (CVE-2016-7053)

  - A heap overflow condition exists in the     chacha20_poly1305_cipher() function within file     crypto/evp/e_chacha20_poly1305.c when handling TLS     connections using *-CHACHA20-POLY1305 cipher suites. An     unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this to     cause a denial of service condition. (CVE-2016-7054)

  - A carry propagation error exists in the     Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure     when handling input lengths divisible by but longer than     256 bits. This can result in transient authentication     and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous     outcomes of public-key operations with specially crafted     input. A man-in-the-middle attacker can possibly exploit     this issue to compromise ECDH key negotiations that     utilize Brainpool P-512 curves. (CVE-2016-7055)

  - An unspecified flaw exists that allows an     unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary     code. (CVE-2017-5815)

  - A command injection vulnerability exists in the dbman     service due to improper validation of user-supplied     input before it is passed to a system call. An     unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, via a     specially crafted opcode 10008 request, to inject and     execute arbitrary OS commands with SYSTEM privileges.
    (CVE-2017-5816)

  - Multiple command injection vulnerabilities exist in the     dbman service due to improper validation of     user-supplied input before it is passed to a system     call. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit     these, via a specially crafted opcode 10007 request, to     inject and execute arbitrary OS commands with SYSTEM     privileges. (CVE-2017-5817, CVE-2017-5819)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10007 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     delete arbitrary files with SYSTEM privileges.
    (CVE-2017-5818)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10004 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5820)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10006 and 10010 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially request, to execute     arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5821)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10010 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5822)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10013 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5823)

  - An unspecified remote code execution vulnerability     exists that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker     to execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-8948)

  - A stack-based buffer overflow condition exists due to     improper validation of input when copying data. An     unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this to     cause a denial of service condition or the execution of     arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-8956)

Note that Intelligent Management Center (iMC) is an HPE product;
however, it is branded as H3C.

The version of HPE Intelligent Management Center (iMC) PLAT installed on the Windows host is prior to 7.3 E0504P04. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :

  - An unspecified flaw exists that allows an     unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary     code. (CVE-2017-5815)

  - A command injection vulnerability exists in the dbman     service due to improper validation of user-supplied     input before it is passed to a system call. An     unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this, via a     specially crafted opcode 10008 request, to inject and     execute arbitrary OS commands with SYSTEM privileges.
    (CVE-2017-5816)

  - Multiple command injection vulnerabilities exist in the     dbman service due to improper validation of     user-supplied input before it is passed to a system     call. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit     these, via a specially crafted opcode 10007 request, to     inject and execute arbitrary OS commands with SYSTEM     privileges. (CVE-2017-5817, CVE-2017-5819)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10007 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     delete arbitrary files with SYSTEM privileges.
    (CVE-2017-5818)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10004 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5820)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10006 and 10010 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially request, to execute     arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5821)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10010 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5822)

  - A flaw exists in the dbman service when handling opcode     10013 requests due to improper validation of     user-supplied input. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this, via a specially crafted request, to     execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-5823)

  - A NULL pointer deference flaw exists, specifically in     the asn1_item_embed_d2i() function within file     crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c, when handling the ASN.1 CHOICE     type, which results in a NULL value being passed to the     structure callback if an attempt is made to free certain     invalid encodings. An unauthenticated, remote attacker     can exploit this to cause a denial of service condition.
    (CVE-2016-7053)

  - A heap overflow condition exists in the     chacha20_poly1305_cipher() function within file     crypto/evp/e_chacha20_poly1305.c when handling TLS     connections using *-CHACHA20-POLY1305 cipher suites. An     unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this to     cause a denial of service condition. (CVE-2016-7054)

  - A carry propagation error exists in the     Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure     when handling input lengths divisible by but longer than     256 bits. This can result in transient authentication     and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous     outcomes of public-key operations with specially crafted     input. A man-in-the-middle attacker can possibly exploit     this issue to compromise ECDH key negotiations that     utilize Brainpool P-512 curves. (CVE-2016-7055)

  - An unspecified remote code execution vulnerability     exists that allows an unauthenticated, remote attacker     to execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-8948)

  - A stack-based buffer overflow condition exists due to     improper validation of input when copying data. An     unauthenticated, remote attacker can exploit this to     cause a denial of service condition or the execution of     arbitrary code. (CVE-2017-8956)

Note that Intelligent Management Center (iMC) is an HPE product;
however, it is branded as H3C.

The version of HPE Network Node Manager i (NNMi) installed on the remote Windows host is 10.0x prior to 10.00 Patch 5, 10.1x prior to 10.10 Patch 4, or 10.2x prior to 10.20 Patch 3. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities that allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code, bypass security restrictions, and perform unauthorized actions.

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version number.

ID	Name	Product	Family	Published	Updated	Severity
101296	HPE Network Node Manager i (NNMi) Multiple Vulnerabilities (HPESBGN03762)	Nessus	Red Hat Local Security Checks	7/7/2017	7/12/2018	critical
100868	H3C / HPE Intelligent Management Center PLAT < 7.3 E0504P04 Multiple Vulnerabilities	Nessus	Misc.	6/19/2017	4/11/2022	critical
100869	H3C / HPE Intelligent Management Center PLAT < 7.3 E0504P04 Multiple Vulnerabilities	Nessus	Windows	6/19/2017	11/15/2018	critical
101297	HPE Network Node Manager i (NNMi) Multiple Vulnerabilities (HPESBGN03762)	Nessus	Windows	7/7/2017	7/12/2018	critical

Detections

Analytics

Plugins Search

critical

critical

critical

critical